1.How would you describe this photograph to a person who could not see?
This photos colour is dull (grey) but it also looks like its been taken in the 1990's because of the lack of pigment.
The picture is taken on a road with signs ,cars &a house. Because it looks like its taken in the 1990 the car looks really old fashioned because no one would really be driving them unless their hip.
2.How is space represented in this photograph?
In this picture the foreground looks close up but its only because you cant see the sign.The middle ground is more dull the only thing there is the caravan. In the back ground is the most detailed as there is a beautiful old fashioned house and a old fashioned car next to it.
3.What is in or out of focus? How has the subject been framed/cropped?
The subject that is out of focus is the back-back ground, the reason its probably is is because its further away. But whats in focus its the caravan, house, and car.
4.What part of the photograph strikes you most interesting?Why?
The house you see i find interesting because it's on a highway and the house looks not in use but it also looks like a hotel.
5.What question's would you ask the artist about this work, if she/he was here?
I would ask : Where did you take these pictures? What time period did you take these? Why did you take it?
6.What do you think it would be like to live in this photograph?What makes you think that?
I think it would be like really old school /hip type, maybe in the 1980/1990's. And the reason i think that is because of the old fashioned house.
7.Why do you suppose the artist made this photograph? What makes you think that?
I think he /she wanted to show this time era and compere from then and now.
8.What do you think is effective about this photograph? what doesn't work so well?
I think whats effective is the background (house ,caravan& car) : What doesn't look good is that he took it right in front of a pole/sign.
This photos colour is dull (grey) but it also looks like its been taken in the 1990's because of the lack of pigment.
The picture is taken on a road with signs ,cars &a house. Because it looks like its taken in the 1990 the car looks really old fashioned because no one would really be driving them unless their hip.
2.How is space represented in this photograph?
In this picture the foreground looks close up but its only because you cant see the sign.The middle ground is more dull the only thing there is the caravan. In the back ground is the most detailed as there is a beautiful old fashioned house and a old fashioned car next to it.
3.What is in or out of focus? How has the subject been framed/cropped?
The subject that is out of focus is the back-back ground, the reason its probably is is because its further away. But whats in focus its the caravan, house, and car.
4.What part of the photograph strikes you most interesting?Why?
The house you see i find interesting because it's on a highway and the house looks not in use but it also looks like a hotel.
5.What question's would you ask the artist about this work, if she/he was here?
I would ask : Where did you take these pictures? What time period did you take these? Why did you take it?
6.What do you think it would be like to live in this photograph?What makes you think that?
I think it would be like really old school /hip type, maybe in the 1980/1990's. And the reason i think that is because of the old fashioned house.
7.Why do you suppose the artist made this photograph? What makes you think that?
I think he /she wanted to show this time era and compere from then and now.
8.What do you think is effective about this photograph? what doesn't work so well?
I think whats effective is the background (house ,caravan& car) : What doesn't look good is that he took it right in front of a pole/sign.